Monday, 10 August 2015

Day of Reckoning Postponed as Global Recovery Builds



In this report, we focus on the big stories, which have unfolded over the past 3 months or so and what implications they have on future economic prospects for both the UK and the global economies. Firstly, we ask why commodity prices keep falling and what it really means; then, we analyse the implications of how Athens capitulated to its creditors in the Eurozone crisis; and we also look at political confidence tricks in the context of the shock General Election result and George Osborne’s Budget, which turns out to be massively less austere than the one forged with the Lib Dems in March, just before the election. In the meantime…

Steady as she goes…

Monetary expansion in Europe, America and China all point to stronger growth this year, signaling another leg to the global expansion. With hindsight, it is clear that the world economy came within a whisker of recession earlier this year but this episode is now behind us. Leading indicators and monetary data in the US, Europe and China point to an accelerating rebound over coming months. The triple effects of quantitative easing by the European Central Bank, a 12pc fall in the trade-weighted index of the euro in 15 months and the fall in Brent crude prices from $110 to $50, have together boosted the global economy and, in particular, lifted Euroland out of its six-year depression.

But why are Commodity prices falling?

Newspaper headlines and financial markets may have shifted their focus from events like the Eurozone and its Greek woes and the dramatic stories associated with the General Election and the Budget but the major global economic event, which continues to unfold, is tumbling commodity prices. It is, in reality, the really big event that continues to impact the wider economy day in, day out. It is the tail-end of China’s hard landing, compounded by Saudi Arabia’s political decision to flood the global crude market and strike a blow against Russia, Iran and the US shale industry. Yet commodity crashes are double-edged. They act as a stimulus for the world economy and are a main reason why the global recovery is building. The consuming nations are effectively enjoying a $500bn "tax cut" from the OPEC cartel. 

A combination of factors continues to knock gold, crude oil and industrial metals such as copper at the moment. What commodities are on the move and what are they used for? Here is a little reminder:

  • Gold 
Primarily used in jewellery and as a financial instrument, such as in the form of bars in central bank vaults, gold is also in demand from electronics companies and for medical uses such as dentistry. Gold has hit its lowest level since early 2010 amid heavy selling. Traditionally the precious metal has served as a safe haven for investors during periods of uncertainty but investors often move money into other assets once calm returns. Gold also suffers when interest rates show signs of going up, as in the US right now where the central bank appears to be readying for a hike. Because gold does not pay interest it loses its shine compared with other assets that do. Ten years ago gold was worth around $500 an ounce only to soar above $1,800 following the first Greek crisis in 2011.

  • Brent crude 
Refined into petrol and diesel, Brent crude is produced from North Sea oilfields. It is used on financial markets as a benchmark against which a large proportion of internationally traded crude oils are priced. At just under $55 a barrel, Brent crude has halved from a high of $115 hit a year ago, battered by a combination of rising supply, particularly in the US, and falling demand on the back of China’s economic slowdown and shaky confidence in Europe. Oil is falling once more further on Monday amid renewed stock market turmoil in China, the world’s biggest energy consumer. 

There is a risk that this could go too far and lead to a second leg of global deflation. This would play havoc with debt dynamics in a world where debt ratios have risen by 30 percentage points of GDP since 2008, reaching unprecedented levels but for now it is the stimulus for the world economy, which is key.

Greece Capitulates to Creditors

Not for the first time over the five years of Greece's euro crisis - or the Eurozone’s Greece crisis – some of us are a little confused. Pretty much everything wanted by the creditors is there in the latest so-called deal - with the odd tweak, but nothing which looks as though it ought to be toxic to them. So, there is a pledge for budget surpluses rising in steps to 3.5% of GDP or national income by 2018; VAT would be raised to three rates of 23% (the standard rate), 13% (for food, energy, hotels and water) and 6% (for medicine and books) - increases that would raise revenue equivalent to 1% of GDP; and Athens is eating the dust of comprehensive reforms of pensions to make them more affordable; and so on.
So here's why I am a bit baffled.
In the run up to the deal, the Greek Prime Minister Alexi Tsipras won an overwhelming mandate from the Greek people, in a referendum, to reject more-or-less these bailout terms and, on the back of that popular vote, he signs up to the supposedly hated bailout. This is big politics, I suppose. Does that mean the Eurozone can go back to life as normal, of inadequate economic performance but Greek Armageddon deferred (again)? Is a rescue done and dusted?
Not yet.
Greece and the Eurozone aren’t yet fixed, not even close.
We simply haven't seen since the 1930s a rich developed country collapse as Greece is doing - millions of people threatened with losing their life savings, companies on the point of collapse, cancer sufferers unsure what treatments, if any, will be available to them. 
Now to most outsiders, this nightmare is in part the consequence of the incompetence and greed of a succession of Greek governments, and the negligence, incompetence and political insensitivity of the rest of the Eurozone and the International Monetary Fund.
In other words, debtor and creditors are both to blame, arguably in equal measure.
So what is particularly shocking to outside observers is the perception that most of the Eurozone, and especially Germany, seems hell-bent on making an example of Athens, humiliating the government of Alexis Tsipras, as the price of a financial rescue that - in a best case - will continue to make Greeks poorer.
The widespread perception that Berlin and Brussels have put fiscal rectitude, the importance of a country paying its debts, above humanitarian concern for a nation's plight, or even the long-term sustainability of the euro itself, will reap a bitter future harvest for the Eurozone and the wider EU.
Will the Eurozone’s marginalisation of Greece make it harder or easier for David Cameron to sell continued membership of the EU to the people of the UK?  It remains to be seen.
The Eurozone crisis began in Greece in 2010. The day of reckoning has been postponed but the threat remains that the Greece debacle has degenerated into an existential crisis for the wider EU.

Election 2015: Dramatic General Election which Reshapes U.K
The next big event was back in May - three months later what have we learnt? 
The first thing to note is that England and Scotland voted for diametrically opposed economic policies. If there was one policy associated with the Tories, it was further deep spending and welfare cuts to generate a budget surplus; if there was one policy associated with the Scottish National Party it was an end to deep spending and welfare cuts. This means that if the integrity of the United Kingdom is to be sustained, somehow a way has to be found - and presumably fairly fast - to reconcile the English vote for more austerity and the Scottish vote for an end to austerity. Also, this would have to be done in a way that doesn't reinforce the view of millions of English citizens that they are subsidising feather-bedded Scottish public services. The transfer of more economic decision-making powers to Edinburgh also has to be done in a way that doesn't split the ruling Conservative party.
Which takes us to the second important uncertainty of this apparently certain result - which is whether Tory MPs will be more or less united going forward.
Strikingly, the Eurosceptic, nationalist and more socially conservative right of the Tory party has been remarkably loyal to David Cameron over the past few years - partly because they could see that in a coalition party discipline was vital to governing and staying in office. But the trouncing of the Liberal Democrats means that Tory MPs no longer have to be on their best behaviour - they no longer have to be careful not to alienate coalition partners with their words and deeds.

The result was a personal triumph for the Prime Minister David Cameron and the future belongs to the man who defied all those - including at times, perhaps, himself - who doubted that he could ever increase his party's support. Nevertheless, it is only a slim overall majority in the Commons or to put it another way, the new Conservative government may not turn out to be a unified, strong government, of the sort that investors prefer and that is partly because the Fixed Term Parliament Act means there can be endless backbench rebellions that do not come anywhere near to tipping the government out of office. 

Apart from anything else, David Cameron will now be under enormous pressure from many of his MPs, alarmed by UKIP's success in taking votes - if not seats - to claw back much more sovereignty from Brussels than is realistic, as a precursor to the much heralded U.K referendum on EU membership. Or to put it another way, the UK's continued membership of the EU is today more uncertain than it has ever been - and many investors and those who run big multinationals never like uncertainty.

Opposition in Disarray

Politics seems to involve confidence tricks at every turn, yet it will be fascinating to see how the political drama will unfold from here. The Labour Opposition is in total disarray, amidst its leadership election.

Who are the candidates? Andy Burnham, Yvette Cooper, Jeremy Corbyn, Liz Kendall.
Ballot papers will be sent out on 14 August; they must be returned by 10 September. The result is on 12 September.

The Labour leadership front runner appears to be the left winger, Corbyn with big-spending plans that may doom his party to irrelevancy. Jeremy Corbyn says he wants a "fundamental shift" in economic policy and for Labour to be a "credible alternative" rather than "Tory light". To those who say he wants to take the party back to the 1980s, he has said he'd go back a decade further, to the 1970s Wilson/Callaghan Labour government.

According to his critics, the Islington North MP's vision for Britain is so left-wing it would make the Labour Party unelectable. Britain's railway network would be renationalised. He is opposed to the HS2 scheme linking London with the north of England, claiming it would turn northern cities into "dormitories for London businesses". Labour should not shy away from putting "necessary things" in public ownership he says as it establishes its future direction.

Osborne’s Big Budget

It was indeed a "big" Budget - just as the chancellor said it would be, delivered by a politician with "big ambitions". George Osborne's stated aim was to create what he called a "new settlement".
So it is that he did something rather surprising - slowing and softening spending and welfare cuts now having promised faster and deeper cuts in the run up to the election. So it is that he adopted a series of Labour policies - a higher re-badged minimum wage, a levy on firms to pay for apprentices, an assault on the tax privilege of so-called non-doms. 

This in addition to delivering Conservative promises to cut income tax, corporation tax and inheritance tax.

But hold on - below those headlines are some potentially eye-watering cuts to benefits - the cuts to tax credits for families despite the pay rise some will get. There are cuts too to Whitehall budgets on the same scale as seen over the past five years – details are emerging.

And there are tax rises - on buying insurance, on buying a car, on pensions - which dwarf the headline tax cuts. 

So, yes, it was a "big Budget" that paves the economic way. 

Whether it is another example of a Gordon Brown style confidence trick to the nation, is a judgement for you.


What of the Deficit?

  • The budget deficit will fall to 2.2pc of GDP in 2016-17, 1.2pc in 2017-18, and 0.3pc in 2018-19, the OBR predicts
  • The government will run a surplus of 0.4pc of GDP in 2019-20, and 0.5pc in 2020-21, according to the forecasts
  • In cash terms, that means the deficit will fall from £69.5bn in 2015-16 to a surplus of £11.6bn in 2020-21
  • Mr. Osborne says that is the biggest structural budget surplus in 40 years
  • Total government spending is rising from £735.5bn in 2014-15 to £844.5bn in 2020-21. Over the same time period total government receipts are set to rise from £672.7bn to £856.1bn, the OBR predicts. 

MARKET OUTLOOK:  MAINTAINING GOOD MOMENTUM

US: MODERATELY POSITIVE
  • The first Fed hike cycle is moving closer – we bet on a first increase this Autumn
  • Quantitative easing (QE) ended earlier in the year
  • US growth will remain solid in 2015.

UK: A POSITION OF RELATIVE STRENGTH
  • Generally positive economic news – inflation and unemployment low; GDP growth picking up again
  • Political uncertainties removed
  • The minutes of Monetary Policy Committee revealed that members are concerned that “domestic cost pressures had increased”, supporting the view that the recovery in prices and wages is on track. 

EURO-AREA: CAUTIOUS; PROSPECTS IMPROVING
  • Economic momentum in the second quarter should help to push yields higher, now that Grexit has been averted in the last minute
  • The ECB continues to provide ample liquidity which gets placed in equity markets given that relative valuation of stocks is attractive. Yet, the market looks currently overbought and we would not exclude a temporary correction.

JAPAN
  • The Nikkei was negatively impacted by the equity meltdown in China recently, however…
  • The Nikkei rose almost by 20% since the start of the year
  • Continued weak yen (and exports) and continuing quantitative easing suggest the rally may endue a little longer, but potentially at a lesser pace.

The imminent Fed hike cycle plays a central role in our assessment for fixed income and foreign exchange markets, we also evaluate its potential impact on equity markets: A study of all Fed tightening cycles since 1964 reveals that the US stock market delivered an average return of around 5% over the twelve months after the initial rate hike. Since we expect a gradual tightening by perhaps just 150 basis points until end of 2016, the stock market is not at risk for a major correction caused by central bank policy.

We continue to focus on the traditional asset classes and always choose a balanced approach to managing those assets. Within equities, we consider a value approach.  Within and across asset classes, we also consider using trend following methods to reduce risk and exposure to catastrophic loss. Geopolitical tensions, any disappointment on corporate earnings and the UK political situation will create market fluctuations. We regard any such dips as an opportunity for selective buying opportunities.  


Sources
  • Invesco Perpetual Investor Magazine April 2015
  • BBC News Politics, Economics, Business, reports May-July 2015
  • CNBC Highlights – Market Outlook, July 2015
  • Financial Times – Global Economy comment and review, Background Research July 2015
  • Daily Telegraph – Politics Aug. 2015
  • The Guardian – Budget Highlights July 2015


The above is our opinion but it is no guarantee of future performance.  The above information should also not be solely relied upon for investment purposes. We seek a balanced portfolio and reiterate the preference for putting in place a balanced portfolio of investments, made up of collective investments. As you are aware, there are many ways to invest in equities. Each has its own practical and taxation considerations and, for this purpose, collective investments, such as unit trusts, are an appropriate means by which a good spread of investments may be achieved. Such pooled funds put the fund in a position to hold a good spread of company shares. The funds are managed on a day-to-day basis by professional investment managers to try and achieve the best possible returns. They represent the best means of managing the risks by asset allocation. The value of investments and any income will fluctuate (this may partly be the result of exchange rate fluctuations) and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Past performance is not a guide to future returns. Current tax levels and reliefs may change. Depending on individual circumstances, this may affect investment returns.

SJK 09.08.15

No comments:

Post a Comment